China’s Rare-Earth Export Controls: Legal Implications for Malaysian Manufacturers

Law stated as at 28 July 2026

China continues to maintain export controls over specified rare-earth-related items under its export-control regime. Since the initial measures introduced in April 2025, the legal framework has developed through additional announcements, temporary suspensions and enhanced enforcement measures. Malaysian manufacturers purchasing rare-earth materials, magnets, components or related technology from China should therefore understand both the controls presently in force and the suspended measures that may become relevant again after November 2026.

This article provides a general overview of the principal legal issues affecting Malaysian businesses. It does not constitute legal advice.

## Current Legal Position

On 4 April 2025, China’s Ministry of Commerce and General Administration of Customs issued Announcement No. 18 of 2025, introducing export controls over specified medium and heavy rare-earth-related items. The announcement took effect immediately upon issuance.

The controls were introduced pursuant to China’s Export Control Law, Foreign Trade Law, Customs Law and Regulations on Export Control of Dual-Use Items. The legal framework generally operates as an export-licensing system rather than a blanket prohibition on all exports of rare-earth materials.

## Controlled Items

Announcement No. 18 applies to specified items relating to samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium. Depending on their technical specifications, the controlled categories may include certain metals, alloys, oxides, compounds, mixtures, targets, magnetic powders and permanent-magnet materials.

Whether an item is subject to control depends on its technical characteristics and classification under the applicable Chinese control list. A broad commercial description, invoice description or customs tariff code may not be sufficient to determine whether the item is controlled.

Malaysian purchasers should therefore obtain accurate technical specifications and material-composition information from their suppliers, particularly where the products comprise magnets, powders, subassemblies or components containing controlled rare-earth elements.

## Export-Licensing Requirements

Where a controlled item is exported from China, the Chinese exporter is generally required to obtain an export licence from the competent Chinese authority before shipment. The primary legal responsibility for obtaining that licence currently rests with the exporter in China.

Nevertheless, the Malaysian purchaser may be required to provide supporting information relating to its identity, corporate ownership, ultimate end user, intended end use, destination of the goods, technical application and any proposed onward transfer or re-export.

The information provided may form part of the exporter’s licence application and may have legal significance. Malaysian purchasers should ensure that all declarations and supporting documents are accurate, complete and consistent with the actual transaction. They should avoid giving undertakings concerning downstream use, re-export or end-user control unless they have the contractual and operational ability to comply with those undertakings.

## Customs Declarations and Product Classification

Chinese exporters are required to accurately declare controlled goods during customs clearance and, where applicable, identify the relevant control classification.

If Chinese customs authorities suspect that goods may fall within the controlled categories, they may request further technical documents, supporting information or clarification before releasing the shipment. The goods may be withheld while the classification or declaration is examined.

Malaysian buyers should therefore ensure that technical descriptions, product specifications and material content supplied to the exporter are sufficiently detailed and accurate. A mismatch between the commercial documents and the technical characteristics of the goods may delay customs clearance or affect the licence application.

## Contractual Considerations

Although the Malaysian purchaser is not ordinarily the licence applicant under the current regime, Chinese export controls may have significant contractual consequences.

Supply agreements should clearly identify which party is responsible for classifying the goods, applying for export licences, preparing supporting documents and responding to regulatory enquiries. They should also specify the information that the Malaysian purchaser must provide and the timeframe within which it must be supplied.

The agreement should distinguish between a delay in obtaining a licence, an outright refusal of the licence, an incorrect product classification, incomplete information supplied by the purchaser and a subsequent change in export-control law. Each situation may justify different contractual consequences.

The parties should also consider whether a licensing delay permits an extension of the delivery period, whether additional compliance costs may be passed to the buyer, whether the buyer may source from another supplier and whether either party may terminate the contract if approval is not obtained within an agreed period.

For longer-term supply or offtake contracts extending beyond November 2026, the agreement should specifically address the possibility that suspended Chinese controls may be reinstated or replaced with new requirements.

## End-User and End-Use Declarations

Chinese exporters may require Malaysian purchasers to sign end-user or end-use declarations as part of the export-licensing process. These declarations may address the ultimate user of the goods, the intended civil or industrial application, the destination, the incorporation of the goods into another product and any proposed resale or re-export.

Malaysian businesses should review these declarations carefully before signing them. The language may create continuing obligations that extend beyond receipt of the goods, including restrictions on onward transfer, changes in use or supply to particular customers or countries.

A Malaysian purchaser should not provide an assurance that it cannot monitor or enforce, particularly where the goods will pass through several levels of a manufacturing or distribution chain. Where the purchaser intends to incorporate the controlled material into a finished product, it should determine whether the relevant declaration or export licence imposes restrictions on the finished product or its subsequent destination.

## Confidentiality and Personal Data

The export-licensing process may require Malaysian companies to disclose sensitive commercial information to the Chinese supplier or the relevant Chinese authorities. This may include technical drawings, product specifications, production volumes, customer identities, beneficial ownership information, business plans and details of downstream applications.

Before disclosing such information, the Malaysian company should review any confidentiality obligations owed to customers, licensors, joint-venture partners or other third parties. It should also consider whether the disclosure is permitted under existing non-disclosure agreements and whether the supplier may use the information solely for regulatory purposes.

Where personal data concerning directors, officers, beneficial owners, employees or customers is provided, the Malaysian company should also consider its obligations under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 and the applicable cross-border data-transfer requirements. The regulatory nature of the request does not automatically displace contractual confidentiality or personal-data obligations.

Where possible, the parties should limit the information disclosed to what is reasonably required for the licence application and document the purpose for which it may be used.

## October 2025 Expansion and Extraterritorial Measures

In October 2025, China introduced a broader package of rare-earth export-control measures. Those measures covered additional rare-earth elements, certain production and processing equipment, and specified rare-earth technologies, including technical information such as process specifications and design materials.

The October 2025 package also included an extraterritorial framework under which certain foreign-produced items could be subject to Chinese export-control jurisdiction if they contained specified Chinese-origin controlled rare-earth content or were produced using controlled Chinese-origin rare-earth technology.

The extraterritorial provisions were particularly significant for manufacturers outside mainland China because, if operative, they could require a foreign manufacturer to obtain Chinese approval before exporting or re-exporting certain foreign-produced goods to a third country. This would potentially place a Malaysian manufacturer within the licensing framework, rather than leaving it merely as the purchaser or contractual counterparty of a Chinese exporter.

The relevant measures are presently suspended and are not currently operative. However, the suspension is scheduled to expire on 10 November 2026 unless extended, amended or replaced. Malaysian manufacturers entering contracts that will continue beyond that date should therefore address the possibility that the extraterritorial controls may revive.

## Potential Effect of the 0.1% Threshold

The suspended extraterritorial framework included a value-based threshold under which a foreign-produced item could fall within the Chinese controls where specified Chinese-origin controlled rare-earth content represented at least 0.1% of the value of the foreign-produced item.

This threshold is not presently operative because the relevant measure is suspended. Nevertheless, it may become important if the suspension expires without further action.

A Malaysian manufacturer potentially affected by the rule would need to identify Chinese-origin controlled content within its product, determine the relevant value at component level and maintain records capable of supporting the calculation. The analysis may be difficult where the rare-earth element is contained within a magnet, subassembly or component supplied through several tiers of the supply chain.

Long-term contracts should therefore require suppliers to provide sufficient origin, composition and valuation information to enable the Malaysian manufacturer to assess future compliance obligations.

## Re-Export and Onward Transfer

Under the current April 2025 framework, Malaysian purchasers should review whether any export licence, end-use undertaking or contractual provision restricts the resale, re-export or onward transfer of controlled goods.

The fact that the goods have lawfully entered Malaysia does not necessarily mean that they may be transferred without restriction. The conditions imposed by the Chinese export licence or the declarations given during the licensing process may continue to apply after importation.

Where the Malaysian purchaser intends to resell the goods, incorporate them into another product or export the finished product to another jurisdiction, it should review the licence conditions and contractual restrictions before proceeding.

If the suspended extraterritorial measures revive, the onward export of certain Malaysian-manufactured goods containing Chinese-origin controlled content may itself require Chinese approval. This potential risk should be reflected in supply, manufacturing, distribution and customer contracts extending beyond November 2026.

## General Export Licences

China has introduced or discussed facilitation measures, including general export licences for eligible exporters that satisfy the applicable compliance requirements. Such arrangements supplement the export-control framework but do not remove it.

A Malaysian purchaser should not assume that its Chinese supplier automatically holds a general licence or that every shipment is covered. The buyer should obtain written confirmation of the licence position, its validity period, the covered products, the permitted destinations and any excluded end uses.

The availability of a general licence may also depend on the exporter, end user, destination and intended application. It should not be treated as a universal exemption.

## Enforcement Developments

China has continued to strengthen enforcement of strategic-mineral export controls. In June 2026, MOFCOM introduced a formal public reporting mechanism for suspected violations involving strategic mineral export controls, effective from 1 July 2026.

The development increases the likelihood that questionable transactions, inaccurate declarations or unauthorised exports may be reported and investigated. Enforcement risk is therefore no longer limited to routine customs review.

Malaysian companies should ensure that technical descriptions, end-user declarations and intended-use statements are accurate and internally verified. They should also maintain records of the licence application, supplier confirmations, supporting documentation, internal approvals and any restrictions communicated by the exporter.

The reported detention of foreign nationals in connection with alleged rare-earth export-control violations also demonstrates that the consequences may extend beyond administrative delay or contractual disruption. Individuals involved in classification, documentation, shipment or approval decisions should understand the seriousness of inaccurate or misleading declarations.

## Destination-Specific Restrictions

China has also adopted destination- and end-user-specific restrictions in relation to certain dual-use items. Announcement No. 1 of 2026 prohibits the export of dual-use items to Japanese military users and to end uses that contribute to Japan’s military capability.

This restriction may be relevant to Malaysian manufacturers that purchase controlled Chinese-origin materials and subsequently supply Japanese customers. The legal analysis may depend on the ultimate customer, the end use and whether the finished product contributes to a prohibited military application.

Malaysian companies supplying Japanese customers should therefore conduct appropriate end-user and end-use due diligence and avoid assuming that a shipment is lawful merely because the immediate transaction takes place through Malaysia.

## Malaysian Strategic Trade Law

Compliance with Chinese export controls does not remove the need to comply with Malaysian law.

The Strategic Trade Act 2010 regulates the export, transhipment, transit and brokering of strategic items and unlisted items that may be used for restricted activities. Depending on the nature of the rare-earth material, component, equipment, technology, destination and end use, a Malaysian export or re-export may require a permit from the Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry.

The Act also contains catch-all controls that may apply to unlisted items where the exporter knows, has reason to believe or has been informed that the item may be used in connection with restricted activities.

A Malaysian company may therefore face separate obligations under Chinese and Malaysian law. Approval for export from China does not constitute approval for re-export from Malaysia, and compliance with Malaysian permit requirements does not excuse non-compliance with Chinese licence conditions.

Before exporting controlled materials, components or finished products from Malaysia, the company should conduct an independent Malaysian strategic-trade assessment.

## Malaysian Rare-Earth Export Policy

Malaysia has also adopted policy restrictions concerning the export of unprocessed rare-earth minerals to support domestic downstream processing. Processed rare-earth materials may be treated differently depending on their nature and the applicable policy or regulatory requirements.

Malaysian manufacturers involved in mining, processing, refining or exporting rare-earth materials should therefore distinguish between unprocessed minerals, processed materials, components and finished products.

The legal position should be confirmed with the relevant Malaysian authorities before any export arrangement is finalised, particularly where the transaction involves raw or partially processed rare-earth materials.

## Legal Measures for Malaysian Manufacturers

Malaysian manufacturers should obtain complete technical specifications and composition data for rare-earth-related goods purchased from China. They should require suppliers to confirm in writing whether the goods are controlled, whether an individual or general export licence is required and whether any restrictions apply to end use, resale or re-export.

All end-user and end-use declarations should be reviewed before execution. The company should verify that the declaration reflects the actual intended use and should avoid accepting continuing obligations that it cannot monitor.

Supply contracts should allocate responsibility for classification, licensing, supporting information, compliance costs, regulatory delays and licence refusal. Contracts extending beyond 10 November 2026 should contain provisions dealing expressly with the possible reinstatement of the suspended extraterritorial rules.

The company should also review its obligations under the Strategic Trade Act 2010 before exporting or re-exporting any controlled material, component or finished product from Malaysia. Confidential information and personal data supplied for regulatory purposes should be protected through appropriate contractual restrictions and internal data-handling procedures.

Records of technical classifications, supplier confirmations, licences, declarations, customer information, internal approvals and regulatory correspondence should be retained for compliance and audit purposes.

## Conclusion

China’s April 2025 rare-earth controls remain in force and currently impose the primary licensing obligation on Chinese exporters. Malaysian purchasers nevertheless play an important role because they may be required to provide legally significant end-user, end-use and technical information and may be bound by restrictions governing resale, re-export or downstream use.

The suspended October 2025 measures create a separate and potentially more serious future risk. If the suspension expires on 10 November 2026 without further amendment, certain Malaysian manufacturers may themselves become subject to Chinese licensing requirements when exporting foreign-produced goods containing specified Chinese-origin rare-earth content or produced using controlled Chinese-origin technology.

The legal issues therefore extend beyond the initial importation of materials from China. Malaysian manufacturers should review their supply contracts, end-use declarations, product-content records, downstream customer arrangements and obligations under the Strategic Trade Act 2010 before entering long-term transactions involving controlled rare-earth materials or technology.

Disclaimer

This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Chinese and Malaysian export-control laws, policies and administrative practices are subject to change. Businesses should obtain legal advice based on the technical characteristics of the relevant goods, the parties, destination, end use and contractual arrangements before proceeding with any transaction.

China's New Outbound Investment Regulation (Effective 1 July 2026): Has China Banned Its Citizens from Buying Overseas Property? 中国《对外投资规定》于2026年7月1日生效——中国是否已禁止公民购买海外房地产?

24 July 2026

Following the coming into force of the Regulations of the State Council on Outbound Investment (State Council Order No. 837) on 1 July 2026, there has been widespread discussion that China has prohibited its nationals from purchasing overseas properties or investing overseas. This has understandably raised concerns among Malaysian property developers, vendors, investors and professionals dealing with Chinese purchasers.

Our review of the new Regulation indicates that this common understanding is not entirely accurate.

The New Regulation

The Regulations of the State Council on Outbound Investment (国务院关于对外投资的规定) were signed by Premier Li Qiang on 5 May 2026, published on 1 June 2026, and came into force on 1 July 2026. It is China's first comprehensive administrative regulation governing outbound investment and establishes an overarching legal framework for overseas investments by Chinese investors.

The Regulation applies to all investors within China, including:

  • enterprises;

  • other organisations; and

  • resident individuals.

"Outbound investment" is broadly defined to include direct or indirect acquisition of ownership, control, management rights or other interests in overseas enterprises or assets through capital contributions, financing, guarantees or other means.

Does the Regulation Prohibit Overseas Property Purchases?

No.

There is no provision in State Council Order No. 837 which expressly prohibits Chinese citizens from purchasing residential or commercial properties outside China.

Likewise, the Regulation does not prohibit Chinese nationals from investing in overseas companies or businesses. Instead, it introduces a comprehensive regulatory framework governing outbound investments, including approval requirements, filing obligations, national security considerations and compliance with existing foreign exchange and other regulatory regimes.

The Real Issue: Cross-Border Transfer of Funds

Although the Regulation itself does not prohibit overseas acquisitions, it also does not create a new right for individuals to transfer funds out of China for overseas investments.

Article 12 requires investors to comply with applicable approval, filing, information reporting and cross-border fund registration requirements. In addition, Article 14 expressly provides that matters relating to foreign exchange, cross-border fund transfers and other regulatory issues continue to be governed by existing laws and regulations.

More importantly, Article 33 provides that the detailed rules governing outbound investments by resident individuals are to be separately formulated by the competent authorities. As at the date of this article, no general implementing measures have been introduced permitting resident individuals to freely remit domestic funds for overseas investments.

Can a Chinese Individual Transfer Money Overseas to Purchase Property?

In practice, the principal difficulty remains China's long-standing foreign exchange control regime, rather than the new Regulation itself.

A mainland Chinese resident generally cannot convert Renminbi and remit funds from China for the purpose of purchasing overseas real estate merely by relying on the annual personal foreign exchange quota. Existing foreign exchange rules continue to restrict the use of personal foreign exchange purchases for overseas property investments.

Accordingly, while a Chinese national may legally own Malaysian property under Malaysian law (subject to Malaysian foreign ownership requirements), the purchaser may encounter practical difficulties in remitting the purchase price from mainland China through ordinary banking channels.

What About Investing in Overseas Companies?

The position is broadly similar for individual investments into overseas businesses.

The new Regulation recognises resident individuals as potential outbound investors but does not establish a general mechanism allowing individuals to remit domestic personal funds to establish or acquire overseas companies.

By contrast, genuine outbound investments undertaken by Chinese enterprises continue to be capable of proceeding through the established outbound direct investment (ODI) approval and filing framework, subject to compliance with the applicable approval, filing, foreign exchange and regulatory requirements.

Practical Implications for Malaysian Businesses

For Malaysian property developers, vendors and businesses dealing with Chinese investors, the legal issue is often not whether the purchaser may own the asset, but whether the purchase funds can be lawfully remitted from mainland China.

Where transactions involve purchasers or investors from mainland China, parties should consider:

  • verifying the source of investment funds at an early stage;

  • understanding whether the investment is made by an individual or through a Chinese corporate vehicle;

  • avoiding assumptions that personal foreign exchange quotas may be used to fund overseas investments;

  • allowing sufficient time for regulatory approvals (where applicable); and

  • conducting appropriate anti-money laundering and source-of-funds due diligence.

Conclusion

The coming into force of State Council Order No. 837 on 1 July 2026 does not amount to a blanket prohibition on overseas property purchases or overseas investments by Chinese nationals.

Instead, the Regulation establishes China's first comprehensive legal framework governing outbound investments while preserving the existing foreign exchange and regulatory approval regime. For cross-border transactions involving Chinese investors, the practical challenge remains the lawful movement of investment funds out of mainland China rather than the legal capacity to acquire overseas assets.

This article is intended for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Specific advice should be obtained based on the facts and circumstances of each transaction.

2026年7月24日

自中国国务院发布的**《国务院关于对外投资的规定》(国务院令第837号)于2026年7月1日**正式施行后,坊间广泛流传中国已禁止中国公民购买海外房地产或进行海外投资。此消息引起不少马来西亚房地产发展商、卖方、投资者及专业人士的关注,尤其是涉及中国买家的跨境交易。

经本所研究及审阅有关法规后,我们认为,上述说法并不准确。

新法规简介

《国务院关于对外投资的规定》由国务院总理李强于2026年5月5日签署,于2026年6月1日公布,并自2026年7月1日起正式实施。

这是中国首部专门规范对外投资活动的综合性行政法规,为中国境内投资者进行境外投资建立统一的法律框架。

根据该规定,其适用于中国境内的投资主体,包括:

  • 企业;

  • 其他组织;及

  • 境内居民个人。

条例所称"对外投资",是指通过出资、融资、担保等方式,直接或间接取得境外企业或者资产的所有权、控制权、经营管理权或者其他权益。

新法规是否禁止购买海外房地产?

答案是否定的。

《国务院关于对外投资的规定》并没有任何条文规定中国公民不得购买海外住宅或商业房地产。

同样地,该规定亦没有禁止中国公民投资海外企业或开展海外业务。

事实上,该规定主要是建立境外投资的监管制度,包括:

  • 投资审批及备案制度;

  • 国家安全审查;

  • 信息申报义务;

  • 以及遵守现行外汇管理及其他相关法律法规。

因此,社会上流传"自2026年7月1日起,中国全面禁止公民购买海外房地产"的说法,并无法从该规定中获得法律依据。

真正受到限制的是资金汇出

虽然新法规并未禁止海外投资,但它也没有赋予个人可以自由将资金汇出境外进行投资的新权利。

根据规定第十二条,投资人仍须依法办理审批、备案、信息报告及跨境资金登记等程序。

此外,第十四条进一步明确,对外投资涉及的外汇管理及跨境资金流动,仍须遵守现行有关法律法规。

更值得注意的是,第三十三条规定,境内居民个人对外投资的具体管理办法,将由国务院有关主管部门另行制定。

截至本文发表之日,中国政府尚未出台允许居民个人可自由汇出境内资金进行海外投资的一般性实施办法。

中国个人是否可以汇款到海外购买房地产?

从实务角度来看,目前最大的限制仍然来自中国长期实行的外汇管理制度,而并非此次新法规。

一般而言,中国境内居民不能单纯依靠每年个人购汇额度,将人民币兑换成外汇后汇往海外购买房地产。

现行外汇管理规定一直限制个人购汇资金用于海外房地产投资。

因此,虽然中国公民依法仍可根据马来西亚法律购买房地产(须符合马来西亚外国人购房规定),但他们在支付购房款时,往往会面临资金能否依法从中国汇出的实际问题。

投资海外公司又是否可行?

对于个人投资海外企业,情况基本相同。

虽然新法规承认居民个人属于对外投资主体之一,但并未建立个人可直接将境内资金汇往海外设立公司或购买股权的一般渠道。

相反,若由中国企业进行海外投资,则仍可按照现有的**境外直接投资(Outbound Direct Investment,简称 ODI)**制度办理,只要符合国家发展改革委、商务部、国家外汇管理局等主管部门的审批、备案及外汇登记要求,企业仍可依法进行海外投资。

对马来西亚企业的实际影响

对于与中国投资者进行交易的马来西亚企业而言,真正需要关注的法律问题,并非中国买家是否可以拥有海外资产,而是:

有关投资资金能否依法由中国汇出。

因此,在涉及中国投资者的交易中,建议有关各方:

  • 尽早确认投资资金来源;

  • 了解投资人是以个人身份还是中国企业身份进行投资;

  • 不应假设个人每年购汇额度可合法用于海外投资;

  • 预留足够时间处理中国境内所需审批及备案程序(如适用);以及

  • 做好反洗钱(AML)及资金来源尽职调查。

结语

《国务院关于对外投资的规定》于2026年7月1日正式生效,并不代表中国已全面禁止公民购买海外房地产或进行海外投资。

该规定主要是建立中国境外投资的整体监管框架,而并未改变现行外汇管理制度。

对于涉及中国投资者的跨境交易而言,未来最大的挑战仍然是投资资金能否依法汇出中国,而不是投资者是否具有购买海外资产的法律资格。

本文仅供一般法律资讯参考,并不构成任何法律意见。如涉及具体交易或个案,建议寻求专业法律意见。

Chat on WhatsApp